There is a moment, usually somewhere between day 14 and day 30, when a new CEO realises that the organisation they accepted the offer to lead is not quite the organisation they were told about during the interview process.
The strategy looks slightly different from the inside. The culture is more entrenched than the board acknowledged. The quick wins that seemed obvious during onboarding are already proving complicated. And somewhere in the building, people are quietly watching to see whether this one will last.
This is not unique to South Africa. But in this country, it comes with layers that no global playbook fully prepares you for.
Because in South Africa, a new CEO does not simply step into a leadership role. They step into a force field of competing pressures, regulatory obligations, stakeholder expectations, political noise, and organisational history; all of which demand attention simultaneously, all of which can derail a tenure before it has properly begun.
The first 100 days have always mattered. In South Africa in 2026, they have never mattered more.
Why the Stakes Have Never Been Higher
CEO turnover globally is accelerating. A record 234 CEOs exited their roles in 2025, an increase of 16% on the year before, and 21% above the eight-year average. Average global CEO tenure has now fallen to 7.1 years, and the margin for error in the opening months is narrowing sharply as boards and investors become less patient and more explicit about what they expect, and when.
South African organisations are not immune to this trend. If anything, they are uniquely exposed to it.
The combination of fragile coalition politics in the form of the Government of National Unity, new Employment Equity sectoral targets that are now legally binding and enforceable, a rand that remains sensitive to global sentiment, persistently high unemployment, and an executive talent pool thinned by emigration, is the environment into which a new South African CEO walks on day one. It is not a stable platform from which to launch a gentle, deliberate transition.
And yet the instinct of most new CEOs, particularly those stepping into the role for the first time, is to take a breath, observe, listen, and avoid committing too early. That instinct, in itself, is not wrong. The problem is that in the South African context, the world will not wait 100 days for you to find your feet.
The Five Pressure Fronts No Onboarding Plan Anticipates
1. The Transformation Imperative Is Now Structural, Not Optional
The Employment Equity Act amendments that came into force in 2025 represent the most significant shift in workplace compliance obligations in a generation. Mandatory numerical targets tied to 18 sector classifications must be met by 2030, and the first substantive compliance assessment takes place in the 2026 reporting period. For designated employers any organisation with 50 or more employees, these are not aspirational goals. Non-compliance risks disqualification from government contracts.
A new CEO who walks in without a clear transformation strategy is already behind. And yet, transformation in South Africa is one of the most politically and emotionally charged responsibilities in the executive portfolio. Getting it wrong, either by being seen to resist it or by approaching it in a way that feels performative or tokenistic, can damage both internal trust and external reputation.
The most effective incoming CEOs treat transformation not as a compliance function, but as a strategic priority embedded in how the business attracts, develops, and retains talent. That positioning takes deliberate thought, and it cannot wait.
2. Labour Relations Move at Their Own Pace
South Africa’s labour relations environment is one of the most complex in the world. COSATU and affiliated unions remain powerful voices in the corporate landscape, and the Labour Relations Act gives employee representatives significant standing in matters that would be purely managerial decisions in other jurisdictions.
A new CEO who arrives with a restructuring agenda needs to understand that the consultation process is not a formality. It is a legal obligation, and short-cutting it creates exposure that can consume months of a leadership team’s focus. More importantly, the relationship between a CEO and organised labour is one that is built over time. It is extremely difficult to recover from an early misstep.
The lesson from South Africa’s most successful leadership transitions is not to avoid these conversations — it is to begin them early, personally, and without a predetermined outcome already decided. Unions can tell the difference between a CEO who is genuinely consulting and a CEO who has already made up their mind.
3. The Board Relationship Is More Complicated Than It Appears
Research from the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance describes a CEO’s first 100 days as shaped not just by what happens in the business, but by the alignment between the CEO and the board. When that relationship is strong and explicit from the outset, the CEO gains a source of stability and counsel available from no other stakeholder. When it is unclear or assumed, it becomes a source of quiet friction that slows down every significant decision.
In South Africa, boards are themselves under pressure. The King IV Report’s stakeholder-inclusive governance model means that non-executive directors are increasingly drawn into questions that once belonged firmly to management. Simultaneously, B-BBEE compliance, ESG disclosure obligations, and the evolving requirements of JSE listing rules are adding new governance demands. A new CEO who does not invest early in clarifying what the board expects is setting themselves up for misalignment precisely when clarity matters most.
One of the most important conversations a new CEO can have in the first two weeks is a private, candid exchange with the chair. Not a briefing. A genuine conversation about what success looks like in year one, what the board’s biggest concerns are, and where the incoming CEO’s autonomy is real and where it has limits.
4. The Internal Political Landscape Is Always More Complex Than the Org Chart
Every organisation has a formal structure and an informal one. The formal structure shows who reports to whom. The informal structure shows who actually influences decisions, who holds institutional memory, who the board trusts regardless of their title, and who has been quietly waiting for the previous CEO to leave.
In South Africa, where many organisations have been through repeated restructuring, state capture consequences, transformation disputes, or simply years of leadership instability, the informal power structures can be deeply entrenched. A new CEO who moves too quickly to reshape the senior team, or who moves too slowly and is seen as captured by existing interests- loses ground either way.
The most effective approach is to name what you are doing. To tell the leadership team explicitly that you are in a listening phase, that you are mapping the organisation honestly, and that decisions about structure and people will be made deliberately rather than reactively. That transparency, more than any early decision, establishes the tone.
5. The External Stakeholder Map Is Wider Than the Business Plan Suggests
South Africa’s political and economic context means that many organisations, particularly those in regulated industries, infrastructure, mining, financial services, or any business with significant state contracts operate in an environment where government, community, media, and civil society are genuine stakeholders whose engagement cannot be delegated to the communications team.
A new CEO who is not visible to these external stakeholders in the first 100 days is, by default, allowing others to define who they are. And in South Africa’s media environment, where leadership transitions attract attention and scrutiny, that is a risk that compounds quickly.
This does not mean the new CEO must be everywhere. It means they need a deliberate external engagement plan that identifies the ten or fifteen relationships that matter most beyond the organisation and makes early, personal contact with each of them.
What the Evidence Says About Successful Transitions
Research into why senior executive hires fail consistently points to the same root cause. It is rarely a capability problem. In South Africa specifically, the findings are clear: most appointments fail because of a misalignment between the executive’s leadership style and the organisation’s cultural, political, or stakeholder landscape. Cultural fit is not a soft factor. It is frequently the determining one.
For boards, this is both a selection challenge and a post-appointment responsibility. Structured onboarding support, a clear mandate, regular chair-CEO dialogue, and an honest first-year success framework are not luxuries. They are the infrastructure that determines whether a new CEO’s potential is ever actually realised.
For the incoming CEO, the discipline of the first 100 days is not about performing confidently. It is about building the foundations with the board, with the leadership team, with organised labour, and external stakeholders that will allow you to lead effectively for years, not just months.
The Eskom Example: When the 100 Days Actually Work
It is worth noting what a well-managed leadership transition looks like in the South African context. When Dan Marokane took over as Eskom Group Chief Executive, his first 100 days were characterised by extraordinary stakeholder breadth. He engaged more than 10,000 employees in person, a quarter of the entire workforce, alongside over 200 external stakeholders across government, organised business, labour, equipment manufacturers, and financial institutions.
That is not a typical onboarding approach. But it reflected an accurate reading of the context: that Eskom’s credibility problem was, at its core, a trust problem, and that trust could only be rebuilt through visible, personal, and sustained engagement.
The results were not instant. But the foundation was laid in those first 100 days in a way that would have taken much longer to establish had the new CEO spent that time in strategy sessions behind closed doors.
What This Means for Boards Making Appointments Now
The implications for boards and nomination committees are significant.
The selection of a CEO must go beyond technical competence and sector experience. The question is not only whether this person can lead an organisation. It is whether they can lead this organisation, in this environment, at this moment. That requires a more nuanced assessment than most traditional search processes provide.
Equally, the board’s responsibility does not end at appointment. The incoming CEO needs clarity on mandate, genuine access to the chair, structured support through the transition, and the space to build relationships without being forced into premature decisions by board impatience.
Boards that invest in the transition consistently see better outcomes. Those who treat the appointment as the end of the process, rather than the beginning of a shared leadership journey, are setting their new CEO up to fail.
A Final Thought for the Incoming CEO
If you are reading this as a newly appointed or soon-to-be-appointed CEO, the single most important thing you can do in your first 100 days is resist the pressure to prove yourself through action.
The pressure will be real. The board will want signals of confidence. Your leadership team will be watching for direction. The market, if you are listed, will be looking for signs of strategic intent. And in South Africa, with everything that is happening politically and economically, there will always be something urgent that demands a response.
But the CEOs who build the most enduring tenures are those who spend the first 100 days building the clarity, the relationships, and the understanding that allows them to act well rather than acting quickly in a context they do not yet fully understand.
South Africa rewards leaders who take the time to understand it before they try to change it.
At Search Partners International, we work with boards and executive leadership teams across South Africa and the African continent to identify, assess, and successfully transition senior leaders into complex roles. If you are appointing a new CEO, or navigating a leadership transition, we would welcome a conversation.
Related reading
The Leadership Exodus: What Happens When Your Best Executive Takes the Dubai, London or Perth Offer